Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Análise de Modos de Falha e Efeitos× | Processo de Hierarquia Analítica× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Tomada de decisão | Tomada de decisão |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1995 | 1980 |
| Autor original≠ | Stamatis, D. H. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Risk priority via product of O·S·D ratings | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Stamatis, D. H. (1995). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution. ASQ Quality Press ISBN: 978-0-87389-300-8 | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Outros nomes | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumo≠ | FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stamatis, D. H. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|