ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise de Discurso Baseada em Campo×Teoria Fundamentada×
ÁreaQualitativoPesquisa qualitativa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1980s–1990s1967
Autor originalSynthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John FrowBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TipoQualitative analytical frameworkMethod
Fonte seminalBourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Outros nomesfield discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDAGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Relacionados63
ResumoField-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Field-based Discourse Analysis · Grounded Theory. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare