ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Coleta de Documentos×Análise de Conteúdo×Análise do Discurso×Análise Temática×
ÁreaMetodologia de surveyQualitativoPesquisa qualitativaPesquisa qualitativa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000sSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)2006
Autor originalRooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn BowenKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret WetherellVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
TipoQualitative / mixed data-collection techniqueQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueMethodMethod
Fonte seminalBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Outros nomesdocument analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysisİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Relacionados3523
ResumoDocument collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Document Collection · Content Analysis · Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare