Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Avaliação de Programas Baseada em Documentos× | Pesquisa Arquivística Histórica× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s | 19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s) |
| Autor original≠ | Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition) | Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century |
| Tipo≠ | Evaluation research design | Qualitative primary-source research |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331 | Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853 |
| Outros nomes | documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation | archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible. | Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|