ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Agregação Múltipla Baseada em Normalização Dupla×Importância dos Critérios Através da Correlação Intercritérios×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem20201995
Autor originalLiao, H., Wu, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoDual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fonte seminalLiao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoDNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: DNMA · CRITIC. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare