ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise de Modularidade Direcionada×Centralidade de Intermediação×
ÁreaAnálise de redesAnálise de redes
FamíliaMachine learningMachine learning
Ano de origem20081977
Autor originalLeicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TipoCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Fonte seminalLeicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Outros nomesdirected community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Relacionados56
ResumoDirected modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Directed Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare