ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Teoria Fundamentada Comparativa Straussian×Análise de Conteúdo Qualitativa Comparativa×
ÁreaQualitativoQualitativo
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/19981983 (Mayring's QCA foundation); comparative adaptations prominent from 2000s onward
Autor originalAnselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967)Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); comparative application developed across communication, policy, and social science research
TipoQualitative comparative research designQualitative research design and analysis strategy
Fonte seminalStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029201
Outros nomesStrauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian)comparative QCA, cross-case qualitative content analysis, multi-context qualitative content analysis, comparative interpretive content analysis
Relacionados64
ResumoComparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions.Comparative qualitative content analysis (comparative QCA) applies a systematic, category-driven reading of texts or documents across two or more cases, groups, time periods, or cultural contexts, with the explicit goal of identifying similarities, differences, and patterns that emerge from the comparison. It combines the interpretive rigour of qualitative content analysis with a structured comparative logic, making it valuable for cross-national policy research, media studies, and any inquiry that requires principled comparison of meaning across contexts.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory · Comparative Qualitative content analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare