Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Teoria Fundamentada Construtivista Comparativa× | Teoria Fundamentada Construtivista× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Qualitativo | Qualitativo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| Autor original≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Fonte seminal | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Outros nomes | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|