ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Autoetnografia Comparativa×Análise Temática Reflexiva×
ÁreaQualitativoQualitativo
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~20132006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
Autor originalHayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & HernandezVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TipoQualitative research designQualitative research method
Fonte seminalChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Outros nomescollaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Relacionados66
ResumoComparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Comparative autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare