Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Questionário de Doença Respiratória Crônica× | Questionário de Controle da Asma× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Pneumologia | Pneumologia |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1987 | 1999 |
| Autor original≠ | Gordon H. Guyatt, McMaster University | Elizabeth F. Juniper, McMaster University |
| Tipo≠ | Self-report or interviewer-administered questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Guyatt, G. H., Berman, L. B., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. O., & Chambers, L. W. (1987). A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax, 42(10), 773-778. DOI ↗ | Juniper, E. F., O'Byrne, P. M., Guyatt, G. H., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. European Respiratory Journal, 14(4), 902-907. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Q | ACQ, Asthma Control Q |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | The CRQ is a 20-item, four-domain questionnaire developed by Guyatt and colleagues at McMaster University in 1987 to measure health-related quality of life specifically in patients with chronic respiratory disease, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. Uniquely, the CRQ can be administered by interview or self-report, and its four domains (dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, mastery) directly address the multidimensional burden of chronic respiratory disease. The CRQ has demonstrated exceptional responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation and other interventions, making it a preferred outcome measure in respiratory research and clinical practice. | The ACQ is a 7-item self-report questionnaire developed by Juniper and colleagues at McMaster University in 1999 to assess the degree of asthma control in the previous one to two weeks. Unlike generic respiratory tools, the ACQ measures symptom-based control and rescue medication use, providing a simple yet psychometrically sound method for evaluating treatment efficacy. It is widely adopted in clinical trials, guideline-driven care, and routine asthma management to guide therapy titration and assess treatment response. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|