ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Ponderação objetiva por correlação de critérios e desvio padrão (CCSD)×Avaliação Aditiva de Razão×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem20102010
Autor originalWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TipoCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Fonte seminalWang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoCCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: CCSD · ARAS. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare