ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise de Mediação Causal (Efeitos Diretos e Indiretos Naturais)×Identificação Causal com Grafos Acíclicos Direcionados (cálculo-do)×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem20102009
Autor originalPearl (2001); general framework by Imai, Keele & Tingley (2010)Judea Pearl
TipoCounterfactual causal decompositionCausal identification framework
Fonte seminalPearl, J. (2001). Direct and Indirect Effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 411-420. link ↗Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606
Outros nomesnatural direct effect, natural indirect effect, NDE / NIE decomposition, counterfactual mediationdo-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus)
Relacionados55
ResumoCausal mediation analysis is a counterfactual framework that splits a treatment's total effect into a Natural Direct Effect (NDE) and a Natural Indirect Effect (NIE) that runs through a mediator. The modern general approach was formalised by Pearl (2001) and Imai, Keele and Tingley (2010), giving the decomposition a precise causal interpretation.DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Causal Mediation Analysis · DAG Causal Identification. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare