Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Case Management Fidelity Assessment× | Evidence-Based Practice Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Social Work | Social Work |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1998 | 1996 |
| Autor original≠ | Gregory Teague, Gary Bond & Robert Drake (Dartmouth ACT fidelity tradition) | Evidence-based medicine tradition (Sackett et al.); translated to social work by Gambrill and others |
| Tipo≠ | Structured rating of a case-management program's adherence to a defined service model | Structured process for integrating evidence, expertise, and client values in practice decisions |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(2), 216–232. DOI ↗ | Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | Case Management Model Fidelity, Care Coordination Fidelity, Assertive Community Treatment Fidelity, DACTS Fidelity Scale | EBP Process, Evidence-Based Practice (Process Model), Five-Step EBP Process, Evidence-Informed Practice Process |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Case management fidelity assessment measures how closely a case-management or care-coordination program matches the defined model it claims to implement — such as assertive community treatment, intensive case management, or a strengths model — by rating specific structural and process dimensions on anchored scales and aggregating them into an overall fidelity score. The approach was established by the Dartmouth tradition of Teague, Bond, and Drake, whose Assertive Community Treatment fidelity scale became the template for measuring whether a program is delivering its model in practice or only in name. | The evidence-based practice (EBP) process is a structured, five-step way of making practice decisions by integrating the best available research evidence with professional expertise and the client's values and circumstances. Originating in evidence-based medicine as defined by Sackett and colleagues and translated into social work by Eileen Gambrill and others, it reframes EBP not as a fixed list of approved programs but as a transparent decision process — ask, acquire, appraise, apply, assess — that an individual practitioner carries out with and for a particular client. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|