Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Bookmark Standard Setting× | Standardized Test Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Education | Education |
| Família≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2001 | 2014 |
| Autor original≠ | Howard Mitzel, Daniel Lewis, Richard Patz & Donald Ross Green (CTB/McGraw-Hill) | Educational measurement profession (AERA/APA/NCME Standards; Lord; Cronbach) |
| Tipo≠ | IRT-based standard-setting procedure using ordered item booklets | Psychometric evaluation of items, reliability, validity, and fairness of standardized tests |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820 | American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. AERA. ISBN: 9780935302356 |
| Outros nomes | Bookmark Method, Bookmark Procedure, Item Mapping Standard Setting, Ordered Item Booklet Method | Standardized Testing Analysis, Test Score Analysis, Item and Test Analysis, Educational Test Psychometrics |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | The Bookmark method is an item-response-theory-based standard-setting procedure in which test items are arranged in a booklet ordered from easiest to hardest. Panelists page through this ordered item booklet and place a 'bookmark' at the point separating items a borderline examinee would likely master from those they would not, judged against a fixed response probability (commonly two-thirds). The latent ability at the bookmark defines the cut score. Developed at CTB/McGraw-Hill, it became one of the dominant methods for large-scale K-12 assessments. | Standardized test analysis is the body of psychometric methods used to evaluate and score standardized educational tests: analyzing how items perform, estimating reliability and the standard error of measurement, scaling scores via classical or item response theory, and assembling validity and fairness evidence. Governed by the professional Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and rooted in test theory synthesized by Lord and others, it is the disciplined work that turns a set of test questions into defensible scores carrying meaning, precision, and fairness. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|