Comparar métodos

	Análise Bibliométrica	Revisão de Mapeamento
Área	Cientometria	Cientometria
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s	Late 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s
Autor original	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)	Buckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence)
Tipo	Quantitative literature analysis	Systematic evidence mapping methodology
Fonte seminal	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.	James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7.
Outros nomes	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis	evidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map
Relacionados	6	6
Resumo	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.	A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis.