ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Benefit Incidence Analysis×Cost-Utility Analysis×
ÁreaPublic PolicyPublic Policy
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20002015
Autor originalPublic-finance and World Bank tradition; codified by Lionel DemeryHealth-economics community; standardised by Drummond and colleagues
TipoDistributional analysis of public expenditureEconomic evaluation expressing outcomes in utility-weighted health
Fonte seminalDemery, L. (2000). Benefit Incidence: A Practitioner's Guide. Washington, DC: World Bank, Poverty and Social Development Group, Africa Region. link ↗Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199665877
Outros nomesBIA, Benefit Incidence, Expenditure Incidence AnalysisCUA, Cost per QALY Analysis, QALY-Based Economic Evaluation
Relacionados43
ResumoBenefit incidence analysis (BIA) assesses how the benefits of public spending on services such as education, health and subsidies are distributed across population groups, typically ranked by income or consumption. It combines data on who uses publicly provided services, drawn from household surveys, with the unit cost or subsidy the government provides per user, to estimate how much of total public spending each group captures. The result reveals whether public expenditure is progressive — favouring the poor — or regressive, and is a standard tool for analysing the distributional fairness of fiscal policy.Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a form of economic evaluation that compares the costs of alternative interventions with their outcomes expressed in a common, preference-based measure of health — most often the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), or in global health the disability-adjusted life year (DALY). By combining length and quality of life into a single index, CUA allows interventions with very different effects to be compared on a like-for-like basis, and it produces an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per QALY gained. It is the dominant method for informing decisions about which health technologies and programs to fund.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Benefit Incidence Analysis · Cost-Utility Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare