Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Atribuição de Autoria (Estilometria)× | Forensic Likelihood Ratio× | Classificação de Texto× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Mineração de texto | Ciências forenses | Mineração de texto |
| Família≠ | Machine learning | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2009 | 2004 | — |
| Autor original≠ | Mosteller & Wallace; Stamatatos | Colin Aitken & Franco Taroni | — |
| Tipo≠ | Supervised stylometric classification | Bayesian evidence evaluation model | Supervised NLP classification task |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Stamatatos, E. (2009). A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556. DOI ↗ | Aitken, C. G. G., & Taroni, F. (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-470-84367-3 | Joachims, T. (1998). Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features. ECML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1398. Springer. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | Stylometry, Authorship Analysis, Yazarlık Atıfı, Authorship Identification | Bayes Factor in Forensics, Forensic Evidence Weight, LR-Based Forensic Evaluation, Adli Olabilirlik Oranı | text categorization, document classification, topic classification, metin sınıflandırma |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the most probable author of an anonymous or disputed text by analysing its stylistic fingerprint. Rooted in the statistical work of Mosteller and Wallace on the Federalist Papers (1964), the field was systematically surveyed and formalised by Stamatatos (2009), who catalogued feature sets ranging from character n-grams and function-word frequencies to syntactic and semantic representations used by modern machine-learning classifiers. | The Forensic Likelihood Ratio (LR) is a Bayesian framework for quantifying the weight of forensic evidence relative to two competing propositions — typically the prosecution and defence hypotheses. Formally developed and systematised by Colin Aitken and Franco Taroni in their 2004 Wiley monograph, the LR expresses how much more probable the observed evidence is under one hypothesis than under the other, providing the court with a single, interpretable number that separates the scientist's role from the fact-finder's role. | Text classification, also called text categorization, is a supervised natural-language-processing task that automatically assigns documents to predefined categories. Building on the support-vector-machine approach to text categorization established by Joachims (1998) and consolidated in the text-mining literature by Aggarwal and Zhai (2012), it powers tasks such as spam detection and topic classification by learning from labelled examples. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|
|