Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Modelo de Risco de Auditoria× | Avaliação de Risco de Fraude× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Contabilidade | Contabilidade |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1983 | 2002 |
| Autor original | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) |
| Tipo≠ | Professional auditing framework | Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure framework |
| Fonte seminal≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | Risk-Based Audit Planning Model | Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud Assessment |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion. | Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|