ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Avaliação Aditiva de Razão×Importância dos Critérios Através da Correlação Intercritérios×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem20101995
Autor originalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fonte seminalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: ARAS · CRITIC. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare