ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Avaliação Aditiva de Razão×Avaliação Proporcional Complexa×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem20101996
Autor originalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
TipoAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Fonte seminalZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: ARAS · COPRAS. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare