Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Processo de Hierarquia Analítica× | Importância dos Critérios Através da Correlação Intercritérios× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Tomada de decisão | Tomada de decisão |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1980 | 1995 |
| Autor original≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tipo≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumo≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|