Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Processo de Hierarquia Analítica× | Método Copeland× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Tomada de decisão | Tomada de decisão |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1980 | 1951 |
| Autor original≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Copeland, A. H. |
| Tipo≠ | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Pairwise majority rule (Condorcet-based aggregation) |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Copeland, A. H. (1951). A 'reasonable' social welfare function. Mimeograph, University of Michigan Seminar on Applications of Mathematics to Social Sciences link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | — | — |
| Relacionados≠ | 8 | 0 |
| Resumo≠ | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPELAND (Copeland Method — Pairwise majority voting with net win-loss score) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Copeland, A. H. in 1951. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|