Comparar métodos

	Processo de Hierarquia Analítica	Processo Analítico de Rede (AHP com feedback e interdependências)	Método Best-Worst	Avaliação Proporcional Complexa
Área	Tomada de decisão	Tomada de decisão	Tomada de decisão	Tomada de decisão
Família	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Ano de origem	1980	1996	2015	1996
Autor original	Saaty, T. L.	Saaty, T. L.	Rezaei, J.	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
Tipo	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)	Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Fonte seminal	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8	Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65
Outros nomes	—	—	—	—
Relacionados	8	8	8	8
Resumo	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.