Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Advocacy Coalition Framework× | Multiple Streams Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1993 | 1984 |
| Autor original≠ | Paul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith | John W. Kingdon |
| Tipo≠ | Theory of the policy process | Theory of agenda setting and the policy process |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499 | Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman. ISBN: 9780321121851 |
| Outros nomes≠ | ACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach | MSF, Multiple Streams Framework, Kingdon Multiple Streams, Policy Windows Analysis |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them. | The Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) is a theory of agenda setting and policy change developed by John Kingdon in his 1984 book Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. It explains why some issues rise to prominence and some solutions are adopted while others languish, by modelling the policy process as three largely independent 'streams' — problems, policies, and politics — that flow through the system. Change becomes possible when these streams are joined together at a fleeting 'policy window', often through the efforts of a 'policy entrepreneur'. The framework emphasises ambiguity, timing and chance over orderly, rational problem-solving. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|