Cliometric Counterfactual Analysis
Cliometric counterfactual analysis is the signature technique of the 'new economic history' pioneered by Robert Fogel: it tests claims about the historical importance of an innovation, institution, or event by constructing an explicit, quantified hypothetical economy in which that factor is absent and measuring how much worse off the counterfactual world would have been. Fogel's 1964 study of American railroads asked not whether railroads mattered but how much, building a hypothetical 1890 economy served by canals and wagons and computing the 'social saving' railroads provided. The shockingly small figure overturned the consensus that railroads were indispensable to American growth, and Fogel and Engerman extended the same explicit, theory-driven, measurement-heavy reasoning to slavery in Time on the Cross. The method fuses neoclassical economic theory, formal counterfactuals, and aggressive quantification of the archival record.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- Fogel, R. W. (1964). Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Johns Hopkins Press. ISBN: 9780801805547
- Fogel, R. W., & Engerman, S. L. (1974). Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Little, Brown. ISBN: 9780393312188
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cliometric Counterfactual Analysis (Econometric History with Hypothetical Alternatives). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/economic-history/cliometric-counterfactual-analysis
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Counterfactual Historical ReasoningHistory↔ porównaj
- Historical GDP Back-ProjectionEconomic History↔ porównaj
- Historical National AccountingEconomic History↔ porównaj
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →