Porównaj metody

	Web Controversy Analysis	Digital Methods
Dziedzina	Science Technology Studies	Science Technology Studies
Rodzina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok powstania	2012	2013
Twórca	Tommaso Venturini, Noortje Marres	Richard Rogers, Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative
Typ	Web-native controversy research method	Empirical research approach for online data
Źródło pierwotne	Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812.	Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018838
Inne nazwy	Web controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartography	Follow the medium, Natively digital research, Web epistemology methods
Pokrewne	4	4
Podsumowanie	Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.	Digital methods is an empirical research approach, developed by Richard Rogers and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative, that takes the methods of online platforms and devices—the link, the like, the hashtag, the search engine ranking—and repurposes them for social and cultural research. Its guiding maxim is to 'follow the medium': rather than importing offline methods like the survey onto the web, the analyst learns what the medium already counts, ranks, and recommends, and turns those native operations into research instruments.