ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Przestrzenne dopasowanie wyników skłonności (Spatial Propensity Score Matching)×Przestrzenna Metoda Syntetycznej Kontroli×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweWnioskowanie przyczynowe
RodzinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok powstania2000s2003–2010s
TwórcaExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onwardAbadie & Gardeazabal (2003); extended to spatial settings by subsequent applied econometric work
TypQuasi-experimental matching estimatorQuasi-experimental causal inference
Źródło pierwotneRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. DOI ↗
Inne nazwySpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matchingspatial SCM, geographic synthetic control, spatial SC, spatial counterfactual control
Pokrewne66
PodsumowanieSpatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.The Spatial Synthetic Control Method adapts the classic synthetic control framework to settings where treated and donor units are defined by geographic location. By constructing a weighted combination of spatially proximate or comparable control regions, the method estimates what would have happened to a treated area absent the intervention, while explicitly accounting for geographic spillovers, spatial autocorrelation, and contiguity among units.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Spatial Propensity Score Matching · Spatial Synthetic Control Method. Pobrano 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare