Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Przestrzenne dopasowanie wyników skłonności (Spatial Propensity Score Matching)× | Dopasowanie wyników skłonności× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina≠ | Wnioskowanie przyczynowe | Statystyka w badaniach |
| Rodzina≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2000s | 1983 |
| Twórca≠ | Extension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Typ≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator | Method |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy≠ | Spatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Pokrewne≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|