ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza wrażliwości z zastosowaniem metodyki Quality Function Deployment×Quality Function Deployment×
DziedzinaPlanowanie eksperymentówPlanowanie eksperymentów
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1990s–2000s (integration period)1966 (Japan); popularised in the West ~1988
TwórcaYoji Akao (QFD foundation); sensitivity extension attributed to multiple QFD researchers (1990s–2000s)Yoji Akao
TypIntegrated engineering design and decision analysis techniqueStructured quality planning and product design method
Źródło pierwotneFung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., & Wang, D. (2006). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 44(12), 2483–2504. link ↗Akao, Y. (Ed.). (1990). Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press. ISBN: 978-0915299416
Inne nazwySA-QFD, QFD sensitivity analysis, robust QFD, House of Quality sensitivity analysisQFD, House of Quality, customer-driven engineering, voice of the customer matrix
Pokrewne24
PodsumowanieSensitivity analysis integrated with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) tests how stable the prioritization of engineering characteristics remains when customer requirement weights or relationship matrix scores are varied. By systematically perturbing the inputs of the House of Quality, teams identify which design parameters are truly critical and which rankings would flip under different assumptions — turning QFD from a one-shot prioritization tool into a robust decision framework.Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a structured method for translating customer needs — the voice of the customer — into specific technical requirements at every stage of product or service development. Originating in Japan in the 1960s, QFD uses a matrix-based tool called the House of Quality to make customer priorities visible, link them to engineering parameters, expose trade-offs, and maintain focus on what customers actually value throughout the design process.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Sensitivity Analysis with Quality Function Deployment · Quality Function Deployment. Pobrano 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare