Porównaj metody

	Dopasowywanie wyników skłonności w ocenie polityki	Estymacja podwójnie odporna (AIPW)
Dziedzina	Wnioskowanie przyczynowe	Wnioskowanie przyczynowe
Rodzina	Regression model	Regression model
Rok powstania	1983; policy evaluation adaptation 1997	2005
Twórca	Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation application	Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
Typ	Quasi-experimental matching estimator	Semiparametric causal estimator
Źródło pierwotne	Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.	Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129.
Inne nazwy	PSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluation	AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
Pokrewne	6	5
Podsumowanie	Policy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.	Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.