ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza Fenomenologiczna Interpretacyjna z Udziałem Uczestników×Analiza tematyczna refleksyjna×
DziedzinaMetody jakościoweMetody jakościowe
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TwórcaJonathan A. Smith (IPA foundation); adapted by participatory researchers in disability, health, and education studiesVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative research designQualitative research method
Źródło pierwotneSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyParticipatory IPA, P-IPA, participatory phenomenological inquiry, collaborative IPARTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Pokrewne56
PodsumowanieParticipatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Participatory IPA) merges the interpretive, meaning-focused rigour of IPA with participatory research principles, engaging participants as active co-researchers in the design, data collection, and analytic phases. The approach is especially valued in studies involving marginalised or vulnerable groups — such as people with cognitive impairments, chronic illness, or lived experience of social exclusion — where standard interview protocols may silence rather than amplify participant voice.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Participatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare