ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Dopasowany model proporcjonalnego hazardu Coxa×Badanie kohortowe z dopasowaniem×
DziedzinaEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1972 (Cox model); matched extension widely adopted 1970s–1980sMid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
TwórcaD. R. Cox (Cox model, 1972); stratification extension for matched designs by subsequent methodologists including D. C. ThomasEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
TypSemi-parametric survival regression for matched dataObservational analytic study design
Źródło pierwotneCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Inne nazwystratified Cox regression, conditional Cox model, matched survival analysis, Cox model for matched pairsmatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Pokrewne45
PodsumowanieMatched Cox proportional hazards is a survival analysis method that extends the Cox regression model to appropriately handle data arising from matched study designs — matched cohorts or matched case-control studies with time-to-event outcomes. By stratifying the partial likelihood by matched set, the method eliminates confounding from matching factors without estimating their baseline hazard, yielding valid hazard ratio estimates that are free from matching-induced bias.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Matched Cox Proportional Hazards · Matched Cohort Study. Pobrano 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare