ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Model strukturalny brzegowy w badaniach edukacyjnych×Dopasowanie wyników skłonności×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweStatystyka w badaniach
RodzinaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania2000 (method); 2006 (canonical education application)1983
TwórcaJames M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernán, Babette Brumback (epidemiology); Guanglei Hong & Stephen Raudenbush (education application)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypCausal inference / weighted regression modelMethod
Źródło pierwotneRobins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyMSM, marginal structural model, MSM with inverse probability weighting, IPW-MSMPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Pokrewne53
PodsumowanieA marginal structural model (MSM) is a causal inference technique that uses inverse probability weighting to estimate the effect of a treatment or educational intervention that changes over time. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) in epidemiology and brought into education by Hong and Raudenbush (2006), MSMs handle time-varying confounding — a challenge that conventional regression cannot resolve.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Marginal structural model in education research · Propensity Score Matching. Pobrano 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare