ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Dopasowanie wyników skłonności wspomagane uczeniem maszynowym×Dopasowanie wyników skłonności×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweStatystyka w badaniach
RodzinaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania20041983
TwórcaMcCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypCausal inference / matchingMethod
Źródło pierwotneMcCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Pokrewne63
PodsumowanieMachine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare