ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Machine Learning-Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting×Ważenie z wykorzystaniem wyniku skłonności (PSW / IPW)×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweWnioskowanie przyczynowe
RodzinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok powstania2003-20181983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
TwórcaHirano, Imbens & Ridder (semiparametric foundation, 2003); Chernozhukov et al. (DML framework, 2018)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypSemiparametric causal estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Źródło pierwotneChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyML-IPW, nonparametric IPW, data-adaptive IPW, ML-augmented propensity weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Pokrewne56
PodsumowanieMachine learning-augmented inverse probability weighting replaces parametric logistic regression with flexible ML algorithms to estimate treatment propensity scores, then reweights the sample to balance treated and control units. By leveraging data-adaptive learners such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting, ML-IPW controls for high-dimensional and nonlinear confounders that classical IPW misses, while retaining the intuitive weighting framework.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Machine Learning-Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare