ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Estymacja podwójnie odporna wspomagana uczeniem maszynowym (ML-DR)×Ważenie z wykorzystaniem wyniku skłonności (PSW / IPW)×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweWnioskowanie przyczynowe
RodzinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok powstania20181983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
TwórcaChernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen, Newey & RobinsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypSemiparametric causal estimator with ML nuisanceCausal inference / reweighting
Źródło pierwotneChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyML-DR, AIPW with ML, Double/Debiased ML doubly robust, DML-DRPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Pokrewne66
PodsumowanieMachine learning-augmented doubly robust (ML-DR) estimation combines the classical doubly robust (AIPW) identification strategy with flexible machine learning models for the nuisance functions — the propensity score and the outcome regression. The result is a causal estimator that is consistent if either ML component is correctly specified, and that achieves valid, root-n inference even when the nuisance models are estimated with high-dimensional regularisation or nonparametric learners.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Machine learning-augmented doubly robust estimation · Propensity Score Weighting. Pobrano 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare