Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Podłużna trafność zbieżna× | Trafność teoretyczna× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Psychometria | Psychometria |
| Rodzina | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1997–2003 | 1955 |
| Twórca≠ | Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Typ≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity evaluation framework |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| Pokrewne | 6 | 6 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|