Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Transfer Wiedzy× | Teoria Procesu Normalizacji (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Nauka o wdrażaniu | Nauka o wdrażaniu |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 2004 | 2006 |
| Twórca≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | May, C. R. |
| Typ | Framework | Framework |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| Pokrewne | 5 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|