ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Teoria odpowiedzi na pozycje (IRT)×Kwantitativna analiza czynnikowa (CFA)×
DziedzinaPsychometriaPsychometria
RodzinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok powstania1952–19681969
TwórcaFrederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)Karl Gustav Jöreskog
TypProbabilistic measurement modelHypothesis-testing latent variable model
Źródło pierwotneLord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theoryCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
Pokrewne54
PodsumowanieItem response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Item Response Theory · Confirmatory factor analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare