ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Inverse Probability Weighting×Ważenie z wykorzystaniem wyniku skłonności (PSW / IPW)×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweWnioskowanie przyczynowe
RodzinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok powstania2003–20151983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
TwórcaHirano, Imbens & Ridder; further developed by Abrevaya, Hsu & LieliRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypCausal inference / weighted regressionCausal inference / reweighting
Źródło pierwotneHirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyHTE-IPW, CATE-IPW, heterogeneous IPW, conditional effect IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Pokrewne56
PodsumowanieHTE-IPW extends standard inverse probability weighting to recover how causal effects vary across subgroups or covariate values. By reweighting each observation by the inverse of its estimated treatment probability, the method creates a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of background characteristics, and then estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) as a function of those characteristics.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Pobrano 2026-06-20 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare