Porównaj metody

	G-Obliczenia (Formuła G)	Estymacja podwójnie odporna (AIPW)	Ważenie odwrotnością prawdopodobieństwa leczenia (IPW / IPTW)
Dziedzina	Wnioskowanie przyczynowe	Wnioskowanie przyczynowe	Wnioskowanie przyczynowe
Rodzina	Regression model	Regression model	Regression model
Rok powstania	1986	2005	2000
Twórca	James M. Robins	Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins	Robins, Hernán & Brumback
Typ	Parametric causal effect estimation	Semiparametric causal estimator	Causal inference weighting estimator
Źródło pierwotne	Robins, J. M. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods: application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling, 7(9-12), 1393-1512.	Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129.	Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560.
Inne nazwy	G-formula, Parametric G-formula, Standardization	AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)	IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
Pokrewne	2	5	5
Podsumowanie	G-computation is a causal inference method for estimating the effect of an intervention or treatment on an outcome from observational data. Developed by James M. Robins in 1986, it provides a parametric approach to standardization that can handle time-varying exposures and confounders. The method estimates what the population outcome would be under different intervention scenarios by utilizing fitted outcome models.	Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.	Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.