ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza modularności kierunkowej×Centralność pośrednictwa×
DziedzinaAnaliza sieciAnaliza sieci
RodzinaMachine learningMachine learning
Rok powstania20081977
TwórcaLeicht, E. A. & Newman, M. E. J.Freeman, L. C.
TypCommunity detection / graph partitioningCentrality measure
Źródło pierwotneLeicht, E. A., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008). Community structure in directed networks. Physical Review Letters, 100(11), 118703. DOI ↗Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41. DOI ↗
Inne nazwydirected community detection via modularity, directed Q-modularity, digraph modularity optimization, Leicht-Newman modularityFreeman betweenness, BC, geodesic betweenness, shortest-path betweenness
Pokrewne56
PodsumowanieDirected modularity analysis extends the classic Newman-Girvan modularity framework to directed graphs, where edges carry a source and a destination. Formalized by Leicht and Newman in 2008, it partitions nodes into communities by maximizing a modularity score that accounts for each node's separate in-degree and out-degree in the null model, making it the standard approach for community detection in citation networks, information flows, and other asymmetric relational data.Betweenness centrality, formalized by Linton C. Freeman in 1977, measures how often a node lies on the shortest path connecting every other pair of nodes in a network. High-betweenness nodes act as bridges or brokers: removing them fragments the network into disconnected components more severely than removing any other nodes.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Directed Modularity Analysis · Betweenness Centrality. Pobrano 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare