ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza programu nauczania×Analiza dokumentów×
DziedzinaMetody terenoweBadania jakościowe
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework)1920
TwórcaGeorge J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale)Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
TypQualitative / mixed document analysisMethod
Źródło pierwotnePosner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
Inne nazwycurriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisaldocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
Pokrewne64
PodsumowanieCurriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Curriculum Analysis · Document Analysis. Pobrano 2026-06-15 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare