ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Analiza kosztów i efektywności w ocenie technologii medycznych×Balanced Scorecard w ochronie zdrowia×
DziedzinaZarządzanie opieką zdrowotnąZarządzanie opieką zdrowotną
RodzinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok powstania19961992
TwórcaDiane Meade Drummond, Michael GoldRobert Kaplan, David Norton
TypEconomic evaluation methodologyStrategic planning and management framework
Źródło pierwotneGold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195108231Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyCEA, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis HealthcareHealthcare BSC, Balanced Scorecard Healthcare
Pokrewne55
PodsumowanieCost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) is an economic evaluation method that compares the cost and health benefits of alternative treatments to determine whether an intervention provides good value for money. Within Health Technology Assessment, CEA is the primary tool for recommending reimbursement and coverage decisions.The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic performance management framework that translates an organization's mission and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. Developed by Kaplan and Norton in 1992 for general business, it has been extensively adapted for healthcare organizations to align hospital operations with strategic objectives.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in HTA · Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare. Pobrano 2026-06-20 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare