ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Złożona ocena proporcjonalna×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
DziedzinaPodejmowanie decyzjiPodejmowanie decyzji
RodzinaMCDMMCDM
Rok powstania19961995
TwórcaZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Źródło pierwotneZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Inne nazwy
Pokrewne88
PodsumowanieCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: COPRAS · CRITIC. Pobrano 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare