Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Test post-hoc Conovera-Imana× | Test post-hoc Nemenyi dla Friedmana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Statystyka | Statystyka |
| Rodzina≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1979 | 1963 |
| Twórca≠ | Conover & Iman | Peter Nemenyi |
| Typ | Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison | Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗ | Nemenyi, P. (1963). Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons. PhD thesis, Princeton University. link ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | Conover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Testi | Nemenyi Testi — Friedman Post-Hoc, Nemenyi multiple comparison test, Nemenyi procedure |
| Pokrewne≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test. | The Nemenyi test is a nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison procedure introduced by Peter Nemenyi in his 1963 Princeton doctoral thesis. It is applied after a significant Friedman test to identify which specific pairs of conditions differ from each other in a repeated-measures or blocked design. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|