ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026