Redaction Criticism
Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
- Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/religious-studies/redaction-criticism
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ sammenlign
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ sammenlign
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ sammenlign
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →