Collaborative Governance Assessment
Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ sammenlign
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ sammenlign
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ sammenlign
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →