Reference Accuracy Study
A reference accuracy study verifies the references in published work against their sources to estimate how often citations are wrong, distinguishing bibliographic errors (mistakes in author, title, year, volume, or pages) from quotation errors (cases where the cited source does not actually support the claim attributed to it). The method draws a sample of references, checks each one against the original document, and reports error rates as proportions with confidence intervals, often classifying errors by severity. Such studies have repeatedly found troubling rates: reviews of medical research, synthesized by Mogull (2017), put the quotation error rate near 14.5 percent, and Smith and Cumberledge (2020) found substantial quotation errors even in general science journals. For libraries and editors, these studies justify citation-checking services and reference-verification workflows.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Mogull, S. A. (2017). Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184727 ↗
- Smith, N., & Cumberledge, A. (2020). Quotation errors in general science journals. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2242), 20200538. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0538 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Reference Accuracy Study (Citation and Quotation Error Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/library-information-science/reference-accuracy-study
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Citation Analysis for Collection DevelopmentLibrary Information Science↔ sammenlign
- Citation Context AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →